1. Home
  2. Studien
  3. Contradictory welfare conditioning: Differing welfare support for natives versus immigrants
Matthias Diermeier / Judith Niehues / Joel Reinecke in Review of International Political Economy Externe Veröffentlichung 22. Juli 2020 Contradictory welfare conditioning: Differing welfare support for natives versus immigrants

The New Liberal Dilemma predicts that European universal welfare states lose support among natives due to large immigration numbers. This article contributes to the debate regarding the validity of the argument posited by the New Liberal Dilemma by examining the contradictory combination of support for a popular welfare state reform, Universal Basic Income (UBI), and conditionality for immigrants’ access to the welfare state in 20 European countries.

Zum Download
Externe Veröffentlichung
Differing welfare support for natives versus immigrants
Matthias Diermeier / Judith Niehues / Joel Reinecke in Review of International Political Economy Externe Veröffentlichung 22. Juli 2020

Contradictory welfare conditioning: Differing welfare support for natives versus immigrants

Artikel in Review of International Political Economy

Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW)

The New Liberal Dilemma predicts that European universal welfare states lose support among natives due to large immigration numbers. This article contributes to the debate regarding the validity of the argument posited by the New Liberal Dilemma by examining the contradictory combination of support for a popular welfare state reform, Universal Basic Income (UBI), and conditionality for immigrants’ access to the welfare state in 20 European countries.

Even though UBI is unconditional, two thirds of UBI supporters want to impose significant conditions on immigrants’ access to the welfare state and thus exhibit contradictory and chauvinistic welfare state preferences. UBI supporters consist of different groups of respondents that are chauvinist. Nativists hold strong anti-immigration attitudes and want to exclude immigrants entirely from welfare benefits, while reciprocity chauvinists are willing to grant immigrants access to the welfare state once immigrants prove themselves to be deserving of benefits by paying taxes for at least a year. In contrast to the welfare magnet hypothesis, inconsistent and chauvinist preferences among UBI supporters are least common in rich European countries with large welfare states. On the macro-level, our findings are independent of countries’ engagement with communism and the share of foreign-born people.

Zum Download
Externe Veröffentlichung
Differing welfare support for natives versus immigrants
Matthias Diermeier / Judith Niehues / Joel Reinecke in Review of International Political Economy Externe Veröffentlichung 22. Juli 2020

Matthias Diermeier / Judith Niehues / Joel Reinecke: Contradictory welfare conditioning—differing welfare support for natives versus immigrants

Artikel in Review of International Political Economy

Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW)

Mehr zum Thema

Artikel lesen
Fiskalpolitik vor 50 Jahren und heute – Expansion, Stabilisierung und Konsolidierung
Martin Beznoska / Tobias Hentze IW-Trends Nr. 1 21. Februar 2024

Fiskalpolitik vor 50 Jahren und heute – Expansion, Stabilisierung und Konsolidierung

Die Haushalts- und Finanzpolitik hat in den vergangenen 50 Jahren viele Krisen und Schocks miterlebt, aber die Grundfragen sind dabei unverändert geblieben.

IW

Artikel lesen
Tobias Hentze / Björn Kauder im ifo Schnelldienst Externe Veröffentlichung 14. Februar 2024

Reformansätze für die Schuldenbremse

Das Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts zum Nachtragshaushalt des Bundes für das Jahr 2021 hat die Politik in Aufruhr versetzt. Die Politik hatte bis dato Notlagen genutzt, um die Schuldenbremse zu umgehen.

IW

Mehr zum Thema

Inhaltselement mit der ID 8880