1. Home
  2. Studien
  3. Behavioral Economics and Leadership: How to bridge the Gap between Intentions and Behavior
Dominik Enste / Sarah-Nell Altenhöner IW-Report Nr. 7 8. März 2021 Behavioral Economics and Leadership: How to bridge the Gap between Intentions and Behavior

The difference between existing intentions and actual behavior occurs in various forms, such as procrastination or companies not being able to implement planned changes, which may lead to competitive disadvantages in ever dynamic business environments.

PDF herunterladen
How to bridge the Gap between Intentions and Behavior
Dominik Enste / Sarah-Nell Altenhöner IW-Report Nr. 7 8. März 2021

Behavioral Economics and Leadership: How to bridge the Gap between Intentions and Behavior

IW-Report

Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW)

The difference between existing intentions and actual behavior occurs in various forms, such as procrastination or companies not being able to implement planned changes, which may lead to competitive disadvantages in ever dynamic business environments.

While current research is strongly focused on attitudes, motivation and the formation of intentions, particularly with regards to ethical consumerism, this study aims to explain the specific discrepancy between intentions and behavior. Based on a review of social psychology, behavioral economics and management literature, the intention-behavior gap and the reasons for the failed translation are examined and room for improvement is outlined. The derived findings are then applied to the examination of the transformational and transactional leadership styles and existing management tools.

Within the framework of the model of behavioral formation, the intention-behavior gap can be defined as the discrepancy between an individual’s willingness and effort to perform an action and the actual performance or omission of said action. Three types of barriers can be identified: cognitive, situational and environmental. Based on dual systems theories, this study finds that the intention-behavior gap occurs whenever the short-sighted, intuitive system dominates cognitive processing. The main causes for this are the effects of cognitive strain, ego depletion, decision fatigue and choice overload. This study determines the status quo bias, social norms and availability heuristic as the main biases of the intuitive system, which lead to a failure to implement intentions. The third section applies these insights to develop a model of behavioral patterns in employees – the Five-Employee Typology, which highlights the importance of adaptive leadership. Subsequently, this study suggests management activities based on behavioral economics to enhance existing tools, with a special focus on effective leadership as an instrument.

PDF herunterladen
How to bridge the Gap between Intentions and Behavior
Dominik Enste / Sarah-Nell Altenhöner IW-Report Nr. 7 8. März 2021

Dominik Enste / Sarah-Nell Altenhöner: Behavioral Economics and Leadership – How to bridge the Gap between Intentions and Behavior

IW-Report

Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW)

Mehr zum Thema

Artikel lesen
Influencer – Macht, Marketing und Manipulation
Chiara Nußbaum / Jennifer Potthoff IW-Report Nr. 43 27. November 2024

Influencer – Macht, Marketing und Manipulation

Die Creator Economy ist eine rasant wachsende Branche, die laut Prognosen in den nächsten Jahren weiter an Einfluss gewinnen und Umsatzsteigerungen erzielen wird. Mit Werbedeals und Kooperationen generieren vor allem Influencer nicht nur hohe Umsätze, sondern ...

IW

Artikel lesen
Rebecca Gabel / Jennifer Potthoff IW-Kurzbericht Nr. 84 25. November 2024

Nachhaltigkeit steigt durch Freiheit statt durch Regulierung und Verbote

Unternehmerische Freiheit ist ein wesentlicher Katalysator für innovative Ansätze zur Bewältigung ökologischer und sozialer Herausforderungen und zur Erreichung der nachhaltigen Entwicklungsziele (SDGs).

IW

Mehr zum Thema

Inhaltselement mit der ID 8880