1. Home
  2. Studies
  3. Behavioral Economics and Leadership: How to Bridge the Gap Between Intentions and Behavior
Dominik Enste / Sarah-Nell Altenhöner IW-Report No. 7 8. March 2021 Behavioral Economics and Leadership: How to Bridge the Gap Between Intentions and Behavior

The difference between existing intentions and actual behavior occurs in various forms, such as procrastination or companies not being able to implement planned changes, which may lead to competitive disadvantages in ever dynamic business environments.

Download PDF
How to Bridge the Gap Between Intentions and Behavior
Dominik Enste / Sarah-Nell Altenhöner IW-Report No. 7 8. March 2021

Behavioral Economics and Leadership: How to Bridge the Gap Between Intentions and Behavior

IW-Report

Download PDF

Share this article:

or copy the following link:

The link was added to your clipboard!

German Economic Institute (IW) German Economic Institute (IW)

The difference between existing intentions and actual behavior occurs in various forms, such as procrastination or companies not being able to implement planned changes, which may lead to competitive disadvantages in ever dynamic business environments.

While current research is strongly focused on attitudes, motivation and the formation of intentions, particularly with regards to ethical consumerism, this study aims to explain the specific discrepancy between intentions and behavior. Based on a review of social psychology, behavioral economics and management literature, the intention-behavior gap and the reasons for the failed translation are examined and room for improvement is outlined. The derived findings are then applied to the examination of the transformational and transactional leadership styles and existing management tools.

Within the framework of the model of behavioral formation, the intention-behavior gap can be defined as the discrepancy between an individual’s willingness and effort to perform an action and the actual performance or omission of said action. Three types of barriers can be identified: cognitive, situational and environmental. Based on dual systems theories, this study finds that the intention-behavior gap occurs whenever the short-sighted, intuitive system dominates cognitive processing. The main causes for this are the effects of cognitive strain, ego depletion, decision fatigue and choice overload. This study determines the status quo bias, social norms and availability heuristic as the main biases of the intuitive system, which lead to a failure to implement intentions. The third section applies these insights to develop a model of behavioral patterns in employees – the Five-Employee Typology, which highlights the importance of adaptive leadership. Subsequently, this study suggests management activities based on behavioral economics to enhance existing tools, with a special focus on effective leadership as an instrument.

Download PDF
How to Bridge the Gap Between Intentions and Behavior
Dominik Enste / Sarah-Nell Altenhöner IW-Report No. 7 8. March 2021

Dominik Enste / Sarah-Nell Altenhöner: Behavioral Economics and Leadership – How to bridge the Gap between Intentions and Behavior

IW-Report

Download PDF

German Economic Institute (IW) German Economic Institute (IW)

Share this article:

or copy the following link:

The link was added to your clipboard!

More on the topic

Read the article
Nudging green behavior
Dominik Enste / Jennifer Potthoff IW-Report No. 26 1. May 2023

Behavioral Economics in Companies: Nudging green behavior

Climate change, the finite nature of natural resources, a growing world population and the quest for prosperity challenge society and policy to act responsibly and sustainably. The debate on climate change and the upcoming energy transition was recently ...

IW

Read the article
Dominik Enste / Julia Hensen / Jennifer Potthoff IW-Policy Paper No. 2 20. February 2023

Does Nudging Help in the crisis?: Behavioral economic measures for freedom-preserving energy conservation

In view of the impending gas shortage, private households are called upon to reduce their gas and energy consumption. The moral appeals of those in power harbor the danger that people will react with reactance instead of the desired change in behavior.

IW

More about this topic

Content element with id 8880 Content element with id 9713