This article examines how political messengers, and not the message, influence attitudes toward renewable energy infrastructure amid an increasingly polarized climate change debate.
Climate action versus environmental protection?: How far-right and environmentalist messengers shape public attitudes towards renewable energy infrastructure in forests
Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW)
This article examines how political messengers, and not the message, influence attitudes toward renewable energy infrastructure amid an increasingly polarized climate change debate.
Focusing on wind power, a highly politicized issue,and solar energy, less contentious, we conducted an experimental survey inGermany. We assess how either a far-right or an environmentalist critic affectacceptance of renewables. Importantly, our analysis examines support forrenewables in forest areas, focusing on a conflict between climate action andlocal environmental protection. Our findings reveal that the messenger impactsattitudes regarding wind energy. Criticism of wind turbine expansion by anenvironmentalist actor leads to greater rejection, while a similar critique bya far-right actor results in increased acceptance, i.e. a backlash effect. No suchinfluence was found for solar energy. We explain these diverging findings bydifferences in politicization. Our findings have important consequences forunderstanding key dynamics of the public debate and political conflict overclimate action.
Climate action versus environmental protection?: How far-right and environmentalist messengers shape public attitudes towards renewable energy infrastructure in forests
Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW)
Erst als ökonomische Narrenhaftigkeit verworfen - jetzt kommen die Ideen zurück
Ideen wie den Tankrabatt hat der Kanzler früher selbst abgelehnt. Unter Druck holt die Politik sie trotzdem wieder hervor und bereitet schon die nächsten Wohltaten vor, schreibt IW-Direktor Michael Hüther in einem Gastbeitrag für das Handelsblatt.
IW
Reformdebatte: Warum die Rente mit 63 abgeschafft werden muss
Zerbröselt der Rentenkompromiss, wenn die Bundesregierung doch an der vorzeitigen Rente für besonders langjährig Versicherte festhält? IW-Ökonomin Ruth Maria Schüler erklärt im Interview, warum es wichtig ist, alle Punkte des Pakets umzusetzen.
IW