1. Home
  2. Studies
  3. Fixed-Term Employment: Springboard or Dead End?
Holger Schäfer IW-Trends No. 1 5. March 2019 Fixed-Term Employment: Springboard or Dead End?

The Federal Government is seeking to impose restrictions on the existing statutory vehicles for limiting the term of employment contracts. The justification often offered for this move is that the employees concerned perceive the uncertainty inherent in fixed-term contracts as negative.

Download PDF
Springboard or Dead End?
Holger Schäfer IW-Trends No. 1 5. March 2019

Fixed-Term Employment: Springboard or Dead End?

IW-Trends

Download PDF

Share this article:

or copy the following link:

The link was added to your clipboard!

German Economic Institute (IW) German Economic Institute (IW)

The Federal Government is seeking to impose restrictions on the existing statutory vehicles for limiting the term of employment contracts. The justification often offered for this move is that the employees concerned perceive the uncertainty inherent in fixed-term contracts as negative.

It is assumed that offering the same positions on a permanent basis is the superior alternative. However, since firms’ demand for labour differentiates between flexible and inflexible employment, there is a clear risk that, in the absence of the term-fixing option, either other instruments will be used to achieve the same flexibility or demand for labour will decrease. The sociodemographic group most affected by fixed-term contracts is that of younger workers at the start of their careers. As can be demonstrated by analyses of the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP), if the use of fixed-term contracts is rendered more difficult, this group may lose any chance of entering the labour market at all. Nor is there any evidence that entering into fixed-term employment precludes a subsequent transition to permanent employment and thus entails the risk of entrapment in permanently precarious circumstances. Within a period of three years, more than half of fixed-term employees switch to permanent employment. An analysis based on propensity score matching shows that, for the previously inactive, taking up fixed-term employment increases the likelihood of immediate success on the labour market. After three years, those entering fixed-term employment have spent over seven months longer in full-time work and seven months less in unemployment. In addition, they have achieved a cumulated salary that is €32,000 higher than that of a control group of similar persons who have not taken this step.

Download PDF
Springboard or Dead End?
Holger Schäfer IW-Trends No. 1 5. March 2019

Holger Schäfer: Befristete Beschäftigung: Sprungbrett oder Sackgasse?

IW-Trends

Download PDF

German Economic Institute (IW) German Economic Institute (IW)

Share this article:

or copy the following link:

The link was added to your clipboard!

More on the topic

Read the article
Public Discussion of the Revised Unemployment Benefit
Matthias Diermeier/ Jan Felix Engler / Holger Schäfer IW-Trends No. 1 23. May 2023

Too Much or Too Little Reform?: Public Discussion of the Revised Unemployment Benefit

Under its new name, Citizens' Benefit (Bürgergeld), Germany’s reformed unemployment benefit was supposed to put basic benefits for job-seekers on a new footing and fulfil the political promise to "overcome" its controversial predecessor known, after its ...

IW

Read the article
Wido Geis-Thöne IW-Report No. 25 25. April 2023

Immigration from Latin America: Successes and potential for securing skilled workers

Against the background of the baby boomers leaving the labour market, Germany will be increasingly dependent on skilled workers from abroad in the coming years in order to secure growth and prosperity.

IW

More about this topic

Content element with id 8880 Content element with id 9713