1. Home
  2. Studies
  3. GTIPA Perspectives: Nations’ Trade Policy Priorities for the Year Ahead
Jürgen Matthes External Publication 27. October 2020 GTIPA Perspectives: Nations’ Trade Policy Priorities for the Year Ahead

As Germany has delegated trade policy to the European Union, the focus is put on highlighting strengths and weaknesses of EU trade and investment policy. Where possible, German policy positions are included.

Download PDF
Nations’ Trade Policy Priorities for the Year Ahead
Jürgen Matthes External Publication 27. October 2020

GTIPA Perspectives: Nations’ Trade Policy Priorities for the Year Ahead

Download PDF

Share this article:

or copy the following link:

The link was added to your clipboard!

As Germany has delegated trade policy to the European Union, the focus is put on highlighting strengths and weaknesses of EU trade and investment policy. Where possible, German policy positions are included.

The European Union has continued to conclude free trade agreements with important trading partners such as Canada, Japan, Mercosur, Singapore, and Vietnam. This strategy opened the door for more bilateral trade liberalization and signals the EU’s strong commitment to open market orientation at a time when protectionist policies have gained ground. The basic framework agreement with Japan on the conclusion of bilateral trade negotiations was deliberately and intentionally announced during a G20 meeting in the presence of the U.S. president. The European Union is to be praised for its global leadership in forging many and varied new free trade agreements. On the flip side of this, however, for years civil society groups have lobbied to use trade agreements (and thus the lever of the large EU market) to induce trading partners to adhere to stricter labour and environmental standards even though trade policy tends to become overloaded and trading partners sometimes alienated. While recent EU FTAs do include sustainability chapters, stricter enforcement of the respective rules is requested. In reaction to these demands, the new European Commission plans to put a larger focus on enforcement. However, more caution is needed in order to prevent lest sustainability rules are misused as protectionist instruments that unduly reduce the competitiveness of developing and emerging countries. Moreover, proposals that EU firms should better monitor their global value chains for possible violations of sustainability standards need to be proportionate to the induced bureaucratic costs and the technical and legal ability to control more remote suppliers in value chains. 

Download PDF
Nations’ Trade Policy Priorities for the Year Ahead
Jürgen Matthes External Publication 27. October 2020

GTIPA Perspectives: Nations’ Trade Policy Priorities for the Year Ahead

Download PDF

Share this article:

or copy the following link:

The link was added to your clipboard!

More on the topic

Read the article
Their development, the status quo and current issues
Berthold Busch IW-Analyse No. 144 16. September 2021

The Central and Eastern European Countries in the EU

In economic terms, the enlargement of the EU to include the Central and East ern European countries (CEECs) has been a success.

IW

Read the article
Galina Kolev Expertise 6. September 2021

The transatlantic economic relations and their outstanding significance for the future of the European and the German economy

The EU and the US remain each other’s most important economic partners, despite the con-frontative course of the Trump administration and China’s rise as a global economic power. This is particularly the case as interconnectedness and the role of foreign ...

IW

More about this topic

Content element with id 8880 Content element with id 9713