1. Home
  2. Studies
  3. Industry, climate protection and trade: Balancing different costs and prices for industrial climate protection
IW-Report No. 41 8. November 2021 Hubertus Bardt Industry, climate protection and trade: Balancing different costs and prices for industrial climate protection

In interrelated markets for exchangeable goods there is - apart from transaction costs - only one single price. In contrast, international climate protection is characterized by very different prices for greenhouse gas emissions.

Download PDF
Balancing different costs and prices for industrial climate protection
IW-Report No. 41 8. November 2021 Hubertus Bardt

Industry, climate protection and trade: Balancing different costs and prices for industrial climate protection

Hubertus Bardt German Economic Institute (IW) German Economic Institute (IW)

In interrelated markets for exchangeable goods there is - apart from transaction costs - only one single price. In contrast, international climate protection is characterized by very different prices for greenhouse gas emissions.

With emissions trading, Europe has introduced relatively high prices for a large proportion of global carbon emissions. However, most emissions worldwide are significantly cheaper or even free of charge. This is an indication of inefficiencies in global climate protection. On the one hand, expensive measures have to be undertaken, while on the other, more favourable measures are not taken. If the aim is to achieve the best possible climate protection with given resources, prices would have to be adjusted internationally. The price differences also result in considerable cost advantages and disadvantages for manufacturing companies in international competition. In order to enable industrial production on climate-friendly conditions, a compensation mechanism must be found. The aim is to enable investments in climate-friendly production methods at the locations that are characterized by demanding climate protection and therefore high prices for emissions. Shifting the investment focus to countries with lower emission costs would weaken the climate protection countries economically without reaching significant progress in reducing emissions. It would also undermine the ability to develop technologies to mitigate climate change worldwide. Different instruments are available, which reduce the additional costs that arise from the different pricing. The public funding of climate protection investments, for which there can currently be no amortization on the market due to the politically set price differences, is just as much a part of the instruments as the funding of ongoing climate protection measures, which is in principle limited in time, but is based on climate protection measures for a long period of time due to the long investment period. For this purpose, models must be developed that weaken price signals in markets as little as possible. International, possibly sectoral, climate clubs would also be a promising instrument. If comparable prices can be agreed for individual products in the most important production locations, that would be an important step for international climate protection without distorting competition at the expense of the most climate-friendly economies.

Download PDF
Balancing different costs and prices for industrial climate protection
IW-Report No. 41 8. November 2021 Hubertus Bardt

Industry, climate protection and trade: Balancing different costs and prices for industrial climate protection

Hubertus Bardt German Economic Institute (IW) German Economic Institute (IW)

More about this topic

More about this topic

Read the article
CO2 Regulation of Road Transport in Europe
Expertise 23. February 2026 Thomas Puls

Compendium 5.7: CO2 Regulation of Road Transport in Europe

With the Compendium CO2 Regulation in Europe, the IW has been providing the interested public with a comprehensive collection of data on the development of CO2 emissions from passenger car traffic in the European Union, as well as on the applicable regulatory framework, since 2015.

Thomas Puls IW

Read the article
IW-Report No. 42 24. September 2025 Alexander Burstedde / Thomas Puls / Jurek Tiedemann

Risks for the implementation of the special infrastructure and climate neutrality fund

The Off-budget fund for infrastructure and climate neutrality (German abbreviation: SVIK) is intended to eliminate the government's investment backlog in Germany. To ensure the success of this gigantic project, this study identifies key stumbling blocks and provides specific recommendations for action.

Alexander Burstedde / Thomas Puls / Jurek Tiedemann IW

More about this topic

Content element with id 9713