Emissions trading at the European level has brought about great benefits for climate protection. That is why it should be promoted rather than distorted by way of national measures.
Emissions trading: An effective instrument
Since 2005, the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) has been regulating the emission of greenhouse gases by placing a cap on the volume of emissions produced by energy supply systems and energy-intensive industries, and by reducing this volume each year. For every tonne of CO2 produced, the plant operator has to buy a carbon credit. Based on the price of the carbon credit, companies decide where it is worth reducing emissions. This enables them to achieve the specified target with the least possible expense.
In this manner, by the year 2020, greenhouse gas emissions throughout Europe are to be reduced from their 2005 levels by 21 per cent. Part of Germany’s emissions have long been regulated at the EU level. But the federal government has also set its own climate protection target, which includes the CO2 volume levels specified by the ETS.
These national measures are more expensive, however, and have very little impact on climate protection. After all, every additional tonne of CO2 that is saved is cancelled out again by carbon credits that become available elsewhere in Europe.
Examples of such a double regulation can especially be seen where lawmakers attempt to influence energy production and consumption. Billions are being spent on the funding of renewable energies. And the joint production of electricity and heat is also being subsidised.
Many of these instruments are not primarily focussed on climate protection. Rather, they serve to promote certain technologies – or simply for the government to take in more funds.
On the long term, however, it should be the CO2 price alone that helps clean and efficient technologies remain competitive and widely applicable.
This is all the more valid as the impact of the ETS incentives becomes increasingly visible, including in Germany. In the last ten years, the plants participating in emissions trading have decreased their greenhouse gas emissions by 12 per cent. The industries that are not active in emissions trading are also seeing some improvements, but not at the same pace (see chart).
Hence, national climate policy should focus primarily on areas that are not participating in the ETS – such as the heating and transportation sectors. At the same time, emissions trading must increasingly be used as a guiding instrument for climate protection.
More on the topic
Europe must take the dare to take the next step: Delors Plan 2.0
In the coming years, the world order of exchange and multilateralism, which has so far been shaped by the West, will lose power, and global institutions will find it increasingly difficult to fulfil their mission of balancing interests and promoting ...
This time is different but still risky: Banking crisis instead of financial crisis
The current crisis of some American and European banks inevitably triggers fears that an international banking crisis could lead to a new financial crisis. But things in 2023 are very different from those in 2007.