The European Commission has asked for a negotiation mandate for an EU-Japan FTA and presented the favourable Commission’s Impact Assessment Report (CIAR, 2012) in July 2012. Here, this proposal and the CIAR are analysed and critically discussed.

Concerning the rationale for a FTA, Japan does fit moderately into the new EU FTA strategy. Japan is a very large and highly developed market, there seems to be the opportunity for a deep and comprehensive FTA and the modest current trade relation appears to promise significant potential for improvement. However, the low growth and the closed nature of the Japanese economy as well as the high relevance of de facto barriers (non-policy related) raise the basic question, how large the export and investment gains for the EU could realistically be.

Japanese Non-Tariff Measures (NTMs) are central to the debate, because the EU will reduce its tariffs, once and for all, in a clearly measurable and enforceable way – in exchange for a potentially significant improvement in Japan’s regulatory framework which, however, is much more difficult to monitor and enforce in the long term. Even though the Japanese governments’ attitude towards regulatory changes seems to have improved significantly over time, there is a general demand for Japanese prior action on effective NTM reductions before FTA negotiations are started – and also some dissatisfaction about the progress already achieved in this respect. Some doubts remain whether reform ownership is sufficiently strong in Japan. The Commission’s strategic approach to deal with this problem – NTM-Roadmap, threat to end negotiations after one year, EU tariff reduction conditioned on Japanese NTM reduction – seems fairly sensible, but still lacks some important underpinning.

The CIAR expects significant gains in output and employment. It is the most optimistic, but also the most up-to-date study – with a more comprehensive data set than other analyses. However, due to optimistic assumptions and the black box character of trade models, results have to be interpreted with some caution. Moreover, there is the general question of whether standard trade models are adequate to cope with the peculiarity that due to the high relevance of non-policy barriers, Japan’s economy is more closed than similar economies.

Policy Brief for the European Parliament

Jürgen Matthes: Towards a Free Trade Agreement with Japan?
IconDownload | PDF

Ansprechpartner

Free Trade between Europe and Japan – hope for global prosperity
Gastbeitrag, 20. Juni 2017

Hubertus Bardt on KKC International Platform Free Trade between Europe and Japan – hope for global prosperityArrow

In an environment with growing protectionism and the danger of economic disintegration and shocks for the global trade policy system, a free trade agreement between Japan and Europe could set a positive example. Progress in the negotiations are necessary to foster growth and prosperity and to send a message to other countries, that modern market economies rely on good trade relations. mehr

IWF-Kritik: Suche nach einer Geschichte
Gastbeitrag, 19. Juni 2017

Michael Hüther im Wirtschaftsdienst IWF-Kritik: Suche nach einer GeschichteArrow

Folgt man der Berichterstattung, dann muss man den Eindruck gewinnen, der Internationale Währungsfonds (IWF) habe sich in seinem Deutschland-Bericht (Artikel IV Konsultationen) vom Mai 2017 ausschließlich mit dem Leistungsbilanzüberschuss beschäftigt, um daraus die Empfehlung höherer staatlicher Kreditaufnahme abzuleiten. mehr

Kein Grund zur Panik
Gastbeitrag, 8. Juni 2017

Christian Rusche auf n-tv.de Kein Grund zur PanikArrow

Unsichere Zeiten für die deutsche Wirtschaft. Mit den USA und Großbritannien wandeln sich gleich zwei Handelspartner zu Wackelkandidaten. Auf der Suche nach neuen Beziehungen richtet sich der Blick nach China. Ein Gastbeitrag von Christian Rusche, Wissenschaftler im Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft Köln. mehr