Transatlantic data transfers Image
Guiding the way: Safe Harbor had been the main basis for the legal transfer of data to the US for more than 4,000 European companies. Photo: Enjoylife2/iStock

European companies can only respire a little bit: A US Senate penal has passed the amended Judicial Redress Act on Thursday and thereby cleared the way to a new data transfer agreement. The Judicial Redress Act will extend the privacy rights of US citizens to EU citizens. However, the European data protection authorities have not yet arrived at a consensus on legal data transfers to the US – therefore, it seems like Safe Harbor II is still far off.

It was already in October that the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that personal data may no longer be transferred from the EU to the US based on the Safe Harbor Agreement due to lacking US data protection.

Safe Harbor had been the main basis for the legal transfer of data to the US for more than 4,000 European companies. Now, the companies have to use alternative legal instruments. First, they can base their data transfers on standard contractual clauses issued by the European Commission. Second, they can use Corporate Binding Rules for data exchange within the company.

The European data protection authorities have granted the companies a reprieve until the end of January to adapt their data transfers to these alternatives. It is also until the end of January that the authorities want to clarify how the ECJ ruling may affect these specific alternatives. Furthermore, the US and the European Commission have promised to provide a new Safe Harbor agreement until this date.

However, the deadlines will likely not be met. The victims are the companies – they will have to operate in a legal limbo from next week on. Therefore, the European data protection authorities must quickly agree on a common position on the future of Safe Harbor. This position should at least transitionally maintain the standard contractual clauses and the Corporate Binding Rules to allow data transfers to the US. In the medium term, however, new rules and reforms are conceivable and necessary on both sides of the Atlantic.

Furthermore, it is important that Europe takes on a strong, consistent attitude in the matter. Only then the balancing act in the Safe Harbor negotiations with the US can succeed, which is crucial for the future of Europe as a business location. This balancing act consists in nothing less than balancing the European fundamental right to the protection of personal data with the requirements of a globally networked economy.


Don’t Sacrifice the EU for Trade with Britain
Contribution, 19 April 2017

Michael Hüther for Frankfurter Allgemeinen Zeitung Don’t Sacrifice the EU for Trade with BritainArrow

Since the UK is the third most important export destination for German businesses and the British share some views on economic governance with Germans, the question arises about the German position in the Brexit negotiations. A contributin by IW Director Michael Hüther for German Newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeinen Zeitung. more

Contribution, 29 March 2017

Berthold Busch, Matthias Diermeier, Henry Goecke and Michael Hüther for LSE Article 50 and game theory: the EU will drive a hard bargainArrow

Having triggered Article 50 of the EU Treaty, the British government officially kicked off the Brexit negotiations on March 29. Until today, both parties pretended not to give in and instead promised a tough negotiation strategy. Game theory offers one way of testing the reliability of these claims and allowing the negotiations to be seen for what they are: a strategically driven, tactical game in which each side attempts to realise their own interests. more

iwd, 22 March 2017

EU 60 years Treaty of RomeArrow

The European Union looks back on 60 years of economic cooperation. The first attempts to political integration are even older, but failed in the French parliament. Currently, however, closer cooperation in security and defense policy is urgently needed. more